Welcome to this week’s Math Munch!

Think fast! How many dots are there in this picture?

This beautiful picture comes to you from Brent Yorgey and Stephen Von Worley. If you counted the dots, you probably didn’t count them one at a time. (And, if you did, can you think of another way to count them?) If you counted them like I did, you noticed that the dots are arranged in rings of five. Then maybe you noticed that the rings of five are themselves arranged in rings of five. And then, finally, you may have noticed that *those* rings are also arranged in rings of five! How many dots is that? 5x5x5 = 125!

In this blog post, Brent describes how he wrote the computer program that creates these pictures. The program factors numbers into primes. Then, starting with the smallest prime factor, the program arranges dots into regular polygons of the appropriate size with dots (or polygons of dots) at the vertices of the polygon.

Here’s how that works for 90. 90’s prime factorization is 2x3x3x5:

As Brent writes in his post, this counting gets much harder to do with numbers that have large prime factors. For example, here is 183:

From this picture, I can tell that 183 has 3 as a prime factor. But how many times does 3 go into 183? It isn’t immediately clear.

When Stephen saw Brent’s creation, he decided the diagrams would be even more awesome if they *danced.* And so he created what he calls the Factor Conga. If you only click on one link today, click that one. The Factor Conga is beautiful and totally mesmerizing.

For more factor diagrams, check out this post from the Aperiodical. There’s a link to the factor diagram by Jason Davies that we posted about over the summer.

Next up, a few months ago we posted about the puzzles of Sam Loyd – one of which was a puzzle called Get Off the Earth. In this puzzle, the Earth spins and – impossibly – one of the men seems to vanish. This puzzle is a type of illusion called a geometrical vanish. In a geometrical vanish, an image is chopped into pieces and the pieces are rearranged to make a new image that takes up the same amount of space as the original, but is missing something.

Here’s a video of another geometrical vanish:

No matter the picture, these illusions are baffling for the same reason. Rearranging the pieces of an image shouldn’t change the image’s area. And, yet, in these illusions, that’s exactly what seems to happen.

Check out some of these other links to geometrical vanishes. Print out your own here. And think about this: Are these illusions math – and, if it so, how? I came across geometrical vanishes because a friend asked if I thought the Get Off the Earth puzzle was mathematical. He isn’t convinced. If you have any ideas that you think can convince him either way, leave them in the comments section!

Finally, the Math Munch team’s home, New York City, (and this writer’s other home, New Jersey) was hit by a hurricane this week. The city and surrounding areas are still recovering from the storm. Sandy left millions of people without power and many without homes. One way people have tried to communicate the magnitude of what happened is to make infographics of the data. Making a good infographic requires a blend of mathematics, art, and persuasion. Here some of the most interesting infographics about the storm that I’ve found. Check out how they use size, placement, and color to communicate information and make comparisons.

To those in places affected by Hurricane Sandy, be safe. To all our readers, bon appetit!

The Factor Conga is way cool, but I found myself liking it for a different reason other than movement. I’ve looked at the book You Can Count on Monsters, and I find the Factor Conga dots to be more interesting and appealing to me. As I watched I thought that maybe I saw some patterns/relationships emerging as the numbers advanced, but they went by too quickly. Do you know if there was a static version of it somewhere?

…then I remembered screen shots and then I somehow ran into this http://mike-naylor.blogspot.com/2012/11/factor-visualization.html just a few minutes later (not even looking for it). It’s just what I was looking for – a composite of screen shots from the Factor Conga which includes integers 1-49.

I also get more out of the patterns than the movement, though when the numbers get very large, the movement also gets more interesting. The dots are so small that they almost make curves as they move into new patterns. If you want static images, you can also pause the program – there are buttons on the bottom right-hand corner of the screen. (Took me a while to realize they were there….)

I also have the book You Can Count on Monsters – and I find these pattern more interesting, too. Some of the arrangements in Monsters aren’t clear to me at all. They also incorporate things other than dots and shapes (like facial features), which says less to me about the numbers than these patterns do. Have you seen the book The Grapes of Math? It’s about counting and has a lot of different arrangements of objects to encourage kids to count by grouping.

Pingback: Factoritzar… multiplicar… « Al nostre ritme

I have a thought about the Geometrical Vanish. In the game Get Off The Earth, each movable piece that is ON the earth gets bigger as it is drawn clockwise. Starting at the 8 o’clock position, one part is just a little piece of pants (8.33%) of the total warrior. The next picture is larger by another 8.33% (16.66%) in size. The following warriors are drawn by increments of 8.33% until when it reaches the 8 o’clock position again (making 12 warriors), it would have reached 108.29% of 12 warriors, making it close to 13! Notice the 13th warrior isn’t drawn completely.

So most definitely yes, this game is based on math

Watching how much of each warrior gets redistributed as the wheel turns is a great mathematical way to analyze the illusion in this puzzle. The total amount of warrior (which sounds like a silly thing to say, but kind of makes sense here) should stay the same, even though the number of warriors changes. Great idea! And certainly math.

The Geometric Vanish is so interesting! I had to watch the video a few times, but could still not figure this out! This is fascinating and so cool!

The wooden puzzle is Amazing!!!! It was really cool. My guess on how this math wizard did this is; as the person rearranged the shapes ,the space where he put the polygons(that weren’t triangles) actually grew in length. It’s just a guess I may be wrong but that is my guess.

I also noticed how the dots were placed in a group with in a group just how she wrote it. I also noticed that there were 125 dots because I also multiplied and I thought that it was really cool because it looked like a flower which was pretty also when I looked at the dots that were in groups of 5 it looked like different colors, at first I thought it was an elusion because I have been looking for an interesting post like this one here. Are there still more patterns waiting to be discovered by using this one?

Pingback: God’s Number, Chocolate, and Devil’s Number | Math Munch

Pingback: Celebration of Mind, Cutouts, and the Problem of the Week | Math Munch

The wooden puzzle is really cool. It is so amazing that a bit could just sort of vanish. I am guessing that the little empty room between the slivers is what makes that tiny square with no filled space. That is my guess but I do not know if it would actually work.

the wooden puzzle was cool. i think that there was a pice missing because the two wooden pieces made a square and when he moved around the puzzle it made a rectangle.