Welcome to this week’s Math Munch!

Before we begin, we’d like to thank all of you who have checked out the site in the past week. Since we’ve kicked off our share campaign, we’ve had so many new visitors and heard from many of them, too! Reading your feedback – whether a recommendation, some praise, a question, or just a brief, “Hello!” – brings us great joy and helps us to know that you all are out there.

Whether you’re a regular reader or visiting the site for the first time, we’d like to ask you for a little favor. If you see some math you like, share it with someone who you think would like it, too! Do you love the burst of excitement that you get from reading about a new mathematical idea, seeing an original piece of math artwork, or trying out a new game? Do you know someone who would love that, too? Then tell them about Math Munch – we’d love to spread the joy.

**If you enjoy Math Munch, join in our ****“share campaign” this week.**

You can read more about the share campaign here. There are lots of ways to participate, and you can let us know about your sharing through this form. We’d love to see the share total rise up to 1000 over the course of the next week.

Now for the post!

***

This beautiful tessellated wooden box was made by computer scientist and mathematical artist Kevin Lee. I met Kevin two weeks ago at the MOVES conference (which Justin and Paul have both written about already). Kevin teaches computer science at Normandale Community College in Minnesota. He makes woodcut tessellations (which won an award for the “Best Textile, Sculpture, or Other Medium” at the Joint Mathematics Meetings art exhibition this year!). He’s also used a combination of his knowledge of computer science and his love of Escher-type tessellations to make software that helps you create tessellations. His new software, TesselManiac!, is due out soon (watch this short movie Kevin made about it for the Bridges conference), but you can download an older version of the software here and play a preview version of The Flipping Tile Game.

To play this game, you must fill in an outline of a tessellation with the piece given. You can use any of four symmetry motions – translation (or shift), rotation, reflection, or glide reflection (which reflects the tile and then translates it along a line parallel to the line of reflection). You get points for each correct tile placed (and lose points if you have to delete). Translations are the simplest, and only give you 5 points each. Reflections are the most difficult – you get 20 points for each one used!

While you’re downloading The Flipping Tile Game, try one of Kevin’s Dot-to-Dot puzzles. These are definitely not your typical dot-to-dot. Only the portion of the image corresponding to one tile in the tessellation is numbered. Once you figure out the shape of that single tile, you have to figure out how to number the rest of the puzzle!

Lucky for us, Kevin has agreed to answer some questions about his life and work as a math artist and computer scientist. Leave a question for Kevin here. (We’ll take questions for the next two weeks.)

I’ve recently been thinking about a paradox that has puzzled mathematicians for centuries. Maybe you’ve heard of it. It’s one of the ancient Greek philosopher Zeno‘s paradoxes of motion, and it goes like this: Achilles (a really fast Greek hero) and a tortoise are going to run a race. Achilles agrees to give the tortoise a head-start, because the tortoise is so slow. Achilles then starts to run. But as Achilles catches up with the tortoise, the tortoise moves a little further. So the tortoise is still ahead. And as Achilles moves to catch up again, the tortoise moves even further! Sounds like Achilles will never catch up to the tortoise, let alone pass him… But that doesn’t make sense…

Will Achilles lose the race??? Check out this great video from Numberphile that explains both the paradox and the solution.

While I was looking for information about this paradox, I stumbled across a great math resource site called Platonic Realms. The homepage of this site has a daily historical fact, mathematical quote, and puzzle.

The site hosts a math encyclopedia with explanations of all kinds of math terms and little biographies of famous mathematicians. You can also read “mini-texts” about different mathematical topics, such as this one about M. C. Escher (the inspiration behind the art at the beginning of this post!) or this one about coping with math anxiety.

I hope we here at Math Munch have given you something to tantalize your mathematical taste buds this week! If so, we’d love it if you would pass it along.

Thank you for reading, and bon appetit!

P.S. – We’ve posted a new game, suggested to us by one of our readers! It’s an online version of Rush Hour. Check it out!

Kahjatsedes tuleb nentida, et Zenon EI esitanud oma arutlust – partadoksina, vaid ja ainuüksi “maksimaalse võimsusega hulga” – näidisena.

See, et Lõpmatus on nii “sissepoolne” kui ka “kosmoloogiline” – on ju mõtteliselt mõistetav – vaja oli vaid matemaatilist apratuuri selle lahtiseletamiseks.

Galilei teisendust (sihil v/x) nii nagu ka teisendusi tasandil xyz – OLI VAJA avaldada funktsionaalsel kujul – ja seda TEGIN MINA 6. klassis: lahendades 1907. aasta ülesannet “rongide järelejõudmises”. Tõsi: tollal “lubati” vaid võrrandisüsteemide lahendamist. Minu-poolne “lihtsus” oli ja on siiani: KEELATUD.

Vastus Zenonilöe:

KUI esialgne (t=0) vahemaa on Achilleusel (A) ja kilpkonnal (K) – (ct) – A kiirusel c – Siis K , kiirusel v, jõuab pageda vaid kaugusele g(vt) oma esialgsest asukohast; A saab aga K kätte kaugusel g(ct) alghetke asukohast. Maigutama paneb (siiani!?) teadlasi, et

“inertsiaalsüsteemides” : g(ct) – g(vt) = ct, KUI v on x-telje-sihiline.

KES KEELUSTAS SELLE ARUTLUSE? Gustav Naan wä?

Pingback: Math Munch is something to chew on | The Aperiodical

In the second paradox, it’s really interesting to think about how your hand halves the distance every time it moves. I never thought about it like that before.

I watched the video on Zeno’s paradoxes. I thought that the part about the infinite process becoming infinite was the most intriguing.

Zeno is an absolute genius!!!!!! My head feels like srambled eggs just thinking about this. Parodox ? Infinite process? One term? I’m getting……. just ,Wow!!!!! 2,500 years. Mind boggle!!!!!!!

I have a question. The paradox the second one for the purpose of example, the paradox is metaphysical you cant touch a paradox neither can you smell one or hear one, if a paradox is metaphysical how can it be expected to be solved in a physical sense? In other words you cant solve pi with an orange. Otherwise i deeply enjoyed the video and how the paradoxes were explained regardless.

The TesselManiac was a fun puzzle game. I liked doing the dot to dots on the guy before playing the game. MC Escher is one of my favorite artist, I even have a Minecraft “Escher” reality cover photo on my Facebook! Out of the 28 asymmetric tiles that could fit the plane in a regular manner, which 1 did MC Eschar not invent? The boring squares?

If the Flipping Game started with the pieces in angles it would have been more challenging.

I love Minecraft!

The time parodox video is amazing. I’m very Intrested in the greek gods thanks to Mr. Rjordan. Plus turtles I mean tortises are my 10 favorite animal. I believe zeno is an absolute genius thinking up something like that is a amazing!!!! Thank you for posting this.

I really like that rush hour game. The only thing I see wrong with it is that when you undo or reset, it doesn’t set back the score.

Hi Noah! That’s interesting– maybe you could find a way to contact the creators of the game and let them know? Glad you enjoyed the game!

I found the fact that your hands can still touch even though they shouldn’t be able to though provoking. I wonder what would happen if he changed variables and instead of breaking down distance, broke down the time it took Achilles to catch up.

The video on Zeno’s Paradox was very interesting. I did not know that this is greatly studied by not just mathematicians but physicians and philosophers. The paradox with Achilles and the tortoise were really cool and i did not ever think of that. But of course we know that he would eventually catch up and beat the tortoise. The paradox with the two hands clapping was also interesting and the math problem that is shown is something i have never thought about. So i guess infinite does add up to something.

I liked this video on Zeno’s Paradox, because it shows that some mathematical rules cannot explain things that occur in reality. It will be interesting to see if other fields combined with mathematics can discover an explanation to this paradox.

The video with the pumpkins was cool because they cut the pumpkins and then put a light in it and it made a shape

The video about Zeno’s Paradox really makes it clear how our deductive reasoning can really take a long time to catch up with the reality or application. The logic is solid, but in practice it doesn’t add up.